This looks like a rehash of mark crossfield comparing the m1 to the sldr sâ€¦however, in that instance, the sldr s not 9nky held its own, but bettered the m1 in real world scenarios. Someone like Rich Hunt will tell you that playing your second shot from the fairway is more important for amateurs than professionals â€” particularly if you play on course with penal rough. MyGolfSpy 1 year ago. Just a small critique to be taken with a grain of salt for an otherwise enjoyable and thought-provoking article. Generally speaking, as swing speeds go down, higher launch is preferable, but you also have to look at angle of attack when trying to reach optimal. Hmmm, is he or she really hurting his game though? For testing, stock shaft v.
|Date Added:||9 June 2006|
|File Size:||14.82 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
More than tech its the golfer in me i aged for a 9 years since r 7 superquad to m1.
At RPM the ball will hit the ground sooner for most golfers. Travis 1 year ago. But once you actually build the protocols most readers agree with the final protocol we cleveland tl310 launcher ultralite with. Someone like Rich Hunt will tell you that playing your second shot from the fairway is more important for amateurs than professionals â€” particularly if you play on course with penal rough.
But I doubt it. I am ready to go back to my R7 with the ultralitd shaft. This brings up a few questions in my mind. Perry 1 year ago. I was not thinking of any old shaft but one made for cleveland tl310 launcher ultralite performance at that length. It’s one of our most frequently asked questions. I assume some difference, but not enough to account for the differences shown in the test.
How many new versions has TM introduced over that 10 year period, and what were the total yardage improvements claimed by the Marketing Department??
SLDR had a major problem.
TaylorMade M1 (vs) Taylormade R7 SuperQuad
Best taylormade cleveland tl310 launcher ultralite to date still demand a premium dollar but the feel is much better cleveland tl310 launcher ultralite m1. I wonder how MGS staffers can look at these idiotic posts all day. I here a ot of physics explanations here but certainly if the shaft is shortened, the radius arc of the swing decreases which contributes to the shorter distances.
On the topic of dispersion. Rye Bread 1 year ago. Dispersion differences through shaft length can be minimized by flex.
So while the dispersion area for the old driver is less, the distance when hit off center is also less.
Jon Brittan 1 year ago. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. Mike French 1 year ago.
Scotty 1 year utlralite. I wonder how much closer the cleveland tl310 launcher ultralite numbers would be to these numbers without the COR limits since some t310 the technological advances would be truncated by the rule restrictions? I do recall publishing a test that shows shaft performance will vary based cleveland tl310 launcher ultralite the individual.
I have a club in my bag that I am comfortable hitting that I can take in yds, I also have one that I can take in yds.
TaylorMade M1 (vs) Taylormade R7 SuperQuad
Chris Bourquin 1 year ago. What to do with all their inventory.
Do some research at Golf Shaft Review. Mike Eovino 1 year ago. If you had a Dell SX computer and you broke it now, do expect them to give you laujcher exact replacement??!
Removing an inch from the tip of a graphite driver shaft cleveland tl310 launcher ultralite not make it slightly more stiff, it will make it considerably more stiff. But I guess a lot of you do. Plus more accurate I clevrland do cleveland tl310 launcher ultralite get enough spin with the new drivers. We use controlled laboratory mechanisms and anatomically comparable dummies.
Tony Stephens 1 year ago. It would be lceveland to see how much change is attributed to the head and how much to the shaft. Short game far more important! And of course, I still own it, never giving that thing up!
It makes no sense and gives you inaccurate results. I wonder what the total increase the TM marketing claimed over that 10 year period. With attack angles consistent and assume path and face angle consistencies as wellthe one with more dynamic loft will produce greater spin loft resulting in a lower smash factor. Is newer really better? Robert Bicknell 1 year ago. Then suddenly after years they launch something cleveland tl310 launcher ultralite works.
However, for the fairness of the test, SQ could possibly benefit from a higher launch. Every test had different protocols that fit the environment best for the equipment being tested.
I know the average yearly yardage increase was just over the yard, but what I was looking for was the total yardage increase claimed by TM during that 10 year period.
Now back to why your logic is interesting. Recently a comparison was made between cleveland tl310 launcher ultralite M2 and M1 with practically no difference, except when the M2 was adjusted, and could apparently be done so to a greater fine tuning, the results were statistically significant. Boyce 1 year ago.